The Creative Finance Field Guide: Every Structure That Closes When the Bank Says No
By Brad Geisen
· 11 min read
In this article
Creative financing in real estate is what you reach for when the numbers work but the bank's terms do not. The property cash-flows at the right payment; it just does not cash-flow at 6% with 20% down. So you change where the money comes from instead of only changing the price.
This is the field guide. It covers the five structures active investors actually use, runs each one on the same property so the comparisons are honest, and ends with how to pick. Every structure has its own glossary entry with more depth; this page is the map.
The property we will use throughout
At standard terms, this property does not pay the investor. The Deal Gap is $54,269. The question the rest of this guide answers is: which structure closes it, and what does each cost the seller?
Why creative finance works: the payment, not the price
Every structure below does one of two things. It lowers the monthly payment (a lower rate, a smaller amortizing loan, or a deferred piece of the price) or it lowers the cash you put in (the seller's equity or existing loan replaces part of your down payment). Sometimes both.
Price cuts do the first thing weakly. Each $10,000 off the price at 80% LTV and 6% saves about $48 a month. A $48,750 seller-carried second at 0% saves $292 a month against the same $48,750 of bank loan. Same dollars, six times the effect on cash flow. That arithmetic is the whole reason creative finance exists.
1. Subject-To (Sub2)
What it is. You take title to the property and the seller's existing mortgage stays in place, in the seller's name. You make the payments. The loan is not assumed (the lender has not approved you); title simply transfers subject to the existing lien. Full definition and risks: Subject-To financing.
Who it fits. A seller with low or negative equity relative to their needs, a loan rate well below market, and a real reason to move: relocation, divorce, a house they cannot afford, a landlord who is done. They often cannot sell conventionally without bringing money to closing.
On our property. The seller has $111,000 of equity ($325,000 − $214,000). A pure Sub2 at full price means paying that equity in cash, which most buyers cannot or should not do. So the realistic version is a hybrid: pay part of the equity in cash and have the seller carry the rest.
| Pure Sub2 | Sub2 + seller carry | |
|---|---|---|
| Cash to seller at closing | $111,000 | $60,000 |
| Seller carries | — | $51,000 at 0%, 7 years ($607/month) |
| Existing loan payment | $1,044 | $1,044 |
| Total monthly debt | $1,044 | $1,651 |
| Cash flow | $570/month | −$37/month |
| Cash invested | ~$114,250 | ~$63,250 |
| Cash-on-cash | 6.0% | −0.7% |
| DSCR (existing loan only) | 1.55 | — |
Pure Sub2 is the best cash flow of any structure here, because the 3.25% loan is doing the work. It also ties up $114,000. The hybrid frees cash but the 7-year carry payment eats the cash flow; stretch the carry to 10 years or defer payments and it works again. This is exactly the tuning DealGapIQ's Deal Maker is for.
The risk. The lender's due-on-sale clause gives them the right to call the loan when title transfers. It is a contract right, not a law you are breaking, and it is enforced rarely while payments are current, but "rarely" is not "never." Mitigate it with reserves to refinance, a servicing company that makes the payments, insurance done correctly, and an attorney who has closed Sub2 deals in the property's state.
How to pitch it. Lead with what the seller keeps, not with the term "Subject-To." The script is here: Subject-To pitch script.
2. Seller financing and the seller carryback
What it is. The seller lends you part (or all) of the purchase price and you pay them back over time, secured by a mortgage on the property. When the seller carries a second behind a new bank first, that piece is a seller carryback. Full entry: seller carryback.
Who it fits. A seller with substantial equity who does not need every dollar at closing and would rather get full price than a discount. Owner-occupants anchored on asking, retiring landlords, estates. Also any seller with no mortgage at all, who can carry the whole thing.
On our property. Pay full asking. Bank first at 65% LTV instead of 80%; seller carries the difference as a second at 0% with a 5-year balloon.
| Conventional | Seller carryback | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $325,000 | $325,000 |
| Bank first | $260,000 at 6.0% → $1,559 | $211,250 at 6.0% → $1,267 |
| Seller second | — | $48,750 at 0%, interest-only or deferred, 5-year balloon |
| Cash flow | $55/month | $348/month |
| Cash-on-cash | 0.9% | 5.6% |
| DSCR (bank first) | 1.04 | 1.27 |
The seller gets their full $325,000: $276,250 at closing and $48,750 in five years. The buyer's cash flow goes up six-fold and the bank's DSCR clears 1.25. Nobody took a haircut; the seller took a delay.
The risk. The balloon. In five years you must refinance or sell to pay the $48,750. Underwrite the refinance now: at a 75% LTV refi, the property needs to appraise at about $347,000 to cover both loans, or you bring cash. Also confirm the first lender allows subordinate financing; many conventional and DSCR programs do, some do not, and the ones that do will count the second's payment in their ratio.
Variations. Interest on the second (3% to 6% is common when the seller wants yield). A short interest-only period then amortization. A longer balloon (7 to 10 years) when the seller is patient. Every one of these is a slider in the Deal Maker; the seller's tolerance sets the range.
3. Wraparound mortgage (all-inclusive trust deed)
What it is. The seller keeps their existing loan and gives you a new, larger loan that wraps around it. You pay the seller on the wrap; the seller pays their lender on the underlying loan and keeps the spread. Title transfers to you. It is Subject-To plus seller financing in one instrument.
Who it fits. A seller with a low-rate loan and meaningful equity who wants a yield on that equity, not just a deferred payment. Common when the seller is investor-minded.
On our property. You put $30,000 down. The seller wraps $295,000 at 5.5% over 30 years.
| Amount | |
|---|---|
| Wrap payment (buyer pays seller) | $1,675/month |
| Underlying payment (seller pays lender) | $1,044/month |
| Seller's monthly spread | $630/month |
| Buyer cash flow | −$61/month |
| Buyer cash-on-cash | −2.2% on $33,250 |
At 5.5% the wrap does not cash-flow for the buyer on this rent; the seller's spread is coming out of the buyer's pocket. At 4.5% the wrap payment drops to about $1,495 and the buyer clears about $120 a month. Wraps are a negotiation over the rate on the seller's equity, and on this property the buyer needs it under 5%.
The risk. Same due-on-sale exposure as Sub2, plus a counterparty risk in both directions: the seller must actually forward the underlying payment. Use a third-party loan servicer that receives the wrap payment and disburses the underlying payment; never let the seller be the only one with their hand on the money.
4. Lease option
What it is. You lease the property and hold an option to buy it at a set price within a set period. Part of your rent may credit toward the price. You control the property without owning it. Investors use it two ways: as the eventual buyer, or as a "sandwich," leasing from the owner and sub-leasing to a tenant-buyer.
Who it fits. A seller who is not ready to sell today but is tired of managing, or who wants a higher price than the market will give now and is willing to wait for it. Also a buyer who expects to qualify for financing in one to three years and wants to lock the price.
On our property. A 3% option fee ($9,750), a 3-year term, a strike price of $325,000, rent of $2,600 with a $300/month credit toward the price.
You are not financing anything yet, so the return math is different: $9,750 down for control of a $325,000 asset and 36 months to decide. If the market rises 4% a year, the option is worth about $40,000 at exercise. If it falls, you walk away out $9,750 and whatever credits you built. The credit reduces the effective price to $314,200 at exercise, and you finance that with whichever structure above fits at the time.
The risk. Non-performance. If you cannot close by the option's end, the fee and credits are the seller's. In a sandwich lease, you also carry the gap if your tenant-buyer leaves. State law on lease options varies (Texas, for instance, regulates executory contracts tightly); use local counsel.
5. The Morby Method: DSCR loan plus seller second
What it is. A DSCR investor loan for the first (typically 70% to 75% LTV), with the seller carrying most or all of the rest as a second, so the buyer brings very little cash. Named for Pace Morby, who popularized it. Full entry: Morby Method.
Who it fits. A rent-ready property (DSCR lenders will not fund a rehab), a seller with enough equity to carry 20% to 25%, and a buyer who has good credit but not a large down payment.
On our property. DSCR first at 75% ($243,750) at 7.25%; seller carries 20% ($65,000) at 0%, deferred 10 years; buyer puts 5% down ($16,250).
| Amount | |
|---|---|
| DSCR first payment | $1,663/month |
| Investor DSCR on the first alone | 0.97 |
| Cash flow before the second | −$49/month |
This is where the guide earns its keep: the Morby Method does not work on this property at this rent. A 7.25% DSCR rate on 75% of the price produces a payment the rent cannot cover, before the seller's second is even considered. A DSCR lender's gross-rent method might show 1.13 and approve it; the investor version says you are feeding it $49 a month plus the second. The structure fits a property with a stronger rent-to-price ratio, or this property at a lower first (say 65% LTV with a larger seller second).
That is the lesson of running every structure on one property: the structure that closes the gap is the one that lowers the payment enough, and not every structure does.
Run these numbers on a real property.
See which structures close the gap on your property →Side by side
| Structure | Cash to seller now | Buyer cash in | Buyer cash flow | Closes the 16.7% gap? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional at asking | $325,000 | $74,750 | $55/mo | No |
| Price cut to Target Buy ($270,731) | $270,731 | $62,268 | $415/mo | Yes, if the seller accepts a $54,000 cut |
| Subject-To (pure) | $111,000 | ~$114,250 | $570/mo | Yes, with a lot of cash |
| Subject-To + $51K carry (7 yr) | $60,000 | ~$63,250 | −$37/mo | Almost; stretch the carry |
| Seller carryback (65% first + 0% second) | $276,250 | $74,750 | $348/mo | Yes, at full price |
| Wrap at 5.5% | $30,000 | $33,250 | −$61/mo | No; needs a rate under 5% |
| Lease option | $9,750 fee | $9,750 | n/a (not yet owned) | Defers the question |
| Morby (75% DSCR + 20% second) | $16,250 | ~$19,500 | −$49/mo before second | No, on this rent |
Two structures close this gap cleanly without a price cut: pure Subject-To (expensive in cash, best in cash flow) and a seller carryback (full price to the seller, six-fold cash flow to the buyer). Two more get close with tuning. Two do not fit this property at all. On a different property with a different loan and rent, the table reshuffles.
How to choose
- Start with the seller's loan and equity. Low equity, low rate: Subject-To. High equity, patient: carryback. High equity, wants yield: wrap. No mortgage: seller financing on the whole price.
- Then the seller's need. Cash now, full price, speed, or exit from management. Each structure delivers a different one.
- Then your constraint. Short on cash: Sub2 hybrid, Morby, lease option. Long on cash, short on cash flow: pure Sub2 or carryback.
- Run the numbers on every candidate before you pitch one. The structure that sounds cleverest is often the one that does not cash-flow.
- Pitch the seller's win, not the structure's name. See the Subject-To pitch script and the Lake Worth teardown for how this sounds out loud.
The non-negotiables
- An attorney in the property's state drafts and reviews. Not a template from the internet. Find one here.
- Third-party servicing whenever payments flow between buyer and seller (Sub2, wraps, carrybacks). The servicer pays the underlying lender and keeps the record.
- Full disclosure to the seller, in writing. The seller in a Sub2 is keeping a mortgage in their name on a house they no longer own. They must understand that.
- Reserves for the balloon or the call. If a due-on-sale letter arrives or a balloon comes due, you refinance or sell. Know today how you would do that.
- Never fabricate the numbers to make a structure fit. If the rent does not support the payment, the seller's second will not save you; it will just be another payment you cannot make.
Creative finance is not a trick for buying houses you cannot afford. It is a set of tools for buying houses whose numbers work at a payment the bank's standard terms cannot produce. The Deal Gap tells you how much payment you need to remove. This guide tells you what removes it.
How you get from a gap to a signed offer, including which structure to lead with and when to combine several, is the subject of How to Make an Offer on an Investment Property.
We analyze. You decide. Not financial, legal, or investment advice. Speak with a real estate attorney in your state before any Subject-To, wrap, or seller-financed transaction.
Frequently asked questions
- What is creative financing in real estate?
- Creative financing is any way of buying a property other than a new bank mortgage plus a cash down payment. The common structures are Subject-To (taking over the seller's existing loan payments), seller financing or a seller carryback (the seller lends you part of the price), wraparound mortgages, lease options, and hybrids such as the Morby Method that pair an investor loan with a seller-carried second. The seller's equity, existing loan, or willingness to wait replaces some of the bank's money.
- Is creative financing legal?
- Yes. Seller financing, lease options, and taking title subject to an existing mortgage are all lawful transactions handled routinely by title companies and closing attorneys. The main legal considerations are the lender's due-on-sale clause in Subject-To and wrap deals (a contract right, not a prohibition), state-specific rules on seller financing and lease options, and full written disclosure to the seller. Use a real estate attorney in the property's state for the documents.
- Which creative finance structure fits which seller?
- Match the structure to the seller's equity and loan. Low equity with a low-rate loan and a need to move points to Subject-To. High equity with no urgent cash need points to a seller carryback or an all-inclusive wrap. A seller who wants full price but can wait on part of it fits a carried second. A seller who is not ready to sell but is tired of managing fits a lease option. A rent-ready property where you are short on cash fits the Morby Method.
- What is the biggest risk in creative financing?
- For Subject-To and wraps, the due-on-sale clause: the lender may call the loan when title transfers. For seller carrybacks, the balloon payment: you must refinance or sell before it comes due. For lease options, losing the option fee if you cannot perform. All of them share one operating risk: you are taking on obligations to a seller who is now your lender, so document everything and use servicing where money moves between parties.
DealGapIQ
Run these numbers on a real address.
Paste any listing. In about 60 seconds you get the Deal Gap, the target buy price, and the offer structures that close it — including the pitch script.
Continue learning
- What Is Subject-To Financing? A Plain-English Guide With ExamplesGlossary
- What Is a Seller Carryback? A Plain-English Guide With ExamplesGlossary
- What Is the Morby Method? A Plain-English Guide With ExamplesGlossary
- Due-on-Sale Clause and Sub2: What Actually Triggers a CallGlossary
- The Subject-To Pitch Script: A Template That Reframes Price as TermsBlog
- The Lake Worth Teardown: One Property, Four Ways to Close ItBlog
- How to Make an Offer on an Investment Property: Price, Terms, and the Four StructuresBlog
- What Is the Deal Gap? The One Number That Tells You What to OfferBlog

Written by
Founder of DealGapIQ. Previously founded Foreclosure.com and built HomePath.com for Fannie Mae and HomeSteps.com for Freddie Mac. 35+ years in real estate data.
Related reading
The Lake Worth Teardown: One Property, Four Ways to Close It
A $448K Lake Worth property said no at standard terms. Here are the four offer structures that turn a -10.8% Deal Gap into a deal that closes.
Read →The Subject-To Pitch Script: A Template That Reframes Price as Terms
The 5-part Subject-To pitch script that lands: annotated template, three seller-type variants, and the three lines that kill the deal. Free to edit.
Read →How to Make an Offer on an Investment Property: Price, Terms, and the Four Structures
A repeatable process for offering on rentals: find the Target Buy, measure the Deal Gap, read the seller, pick one of four structures, write it once.
Read →